West Virginia No Severance Tax Model for PA

delaware riverkeeper - Jim Willis reports

Jim Willis
Editor & Publisher, Marcellus Drilling News (MDN)


West Virginia’s severance tax is a pro performer compared to Pennsylvania’s impact fee; something legislators should bear in mind as Gov. Wolf tries again.

Thursday, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), the agency charged with keeping tabs on impact fee revenue from shale drillers (Pennsylvania’s version of a severance tax), released the final numbers for impact fee revenues and disbursements in 2016 (see PA PUC Impact Fee Report: Revenue Down Again in 2016). Revenues were from the impact fee were down for the third straight year.

And, since politicians in Harrisburg are in the midst of budget negotiations and attempting to close a perennial gap in the budget, we have no doubt the hew and cry will go out, yet again, to enact a severance tax on shale gas and oil–either in addition to or on top of the impact fee. They ought to look at West Virginia.

We’ve written about PA Gov. Wolf’s (and his fellow Democrats’) manifestly dumb idea of implementing a severance tax (see our numerous stories on the topic here). The new argument that will be used in Harrisburg is this: If we only had a severance tax, we wouldn’t experience as much of a decrease in revenue as we have with an impact fee.

severance tax

This post aims to debunk that claim. In fact, an impact is far superior to a severance tax (the tax “everyone has but us here in Pennsylvania”). Why so? Because, as the numbers below show, PA’s decrease in revenue from an impact fee has been far less than the drop in severance taxes in other states, like West Virginia.

In Pennsylvania, the impact fee, which is calculated on new shale wells drilled (over a period of years, sliding scale), has raised this much money in fees (i.e. taxes) over the past three years:

2014 – $223,500,000
2015 – $187,711,700
2016 – $173,258,900


From 2014 to 2015, impact fee revenue decreased by 16%. From 2015 to 2016, it decreased by another 8%.

In total, from 2014 to 2016, PA impact fee revenue went down 22%

In West Virginia, where they have a severance tax based on the amount of gas coming out of the ground, rather than on new wells drilled, the tax raised this much over the past three years:

2014 – $161,000,000
2015 – $136,500,000
2016 – $62,600,000


From 2014 to 2015, severance tax revenue decreased by 15%. From 2015 to 2016, it decreased by another 54%.

In total, from 2014 to 2016, West Virginia severance tax revenue went down 61%.

severance tax

Both types of revenue generators will go down in the hard times, when the price of natural gas bottoms out. However, a severance tax is much more volatile than an impact fee. Drillers will keep drilling some new wells even in the down years in order to hold acreage in danger of slipping away due to leases expiring.

And, as soon as the drill bit hits the ground and starts chewing, that well gets taxed in Pennsylvania – even if no gas comes out of it. But, with existing wells flowing gas, like those in West Virgia, it’s easy to just turn the spigot off and wait for prices to go up again. No gas flowing, no severance tax revenue.

Our point: An impact fee is better than a severance tax. Pennsylvania has the kind of “tax” it should have, and if the Commowealth passes a severance tax bill, it will kill the goose laying the golden eggs that many local municipalities have come to rely on for revenue.

For more great articles on natural gas development every single business day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.

The post West Virginia No Severance Tax Model for PA appeared first on Natural Gas Now.

Continue Reading: Natural Gas Now

(Visited 49 times, 1 visits today)



© 2014 RenewaNews